Friday 14 January 2022

Revelation is not about the Body of Christ

 

Wednesday, September 9, 2020

Revelation is not about the Body of Christ

The body of Christ is not the subject of the book of Revelation. Here is some evidence to support that fact:
1. Its placement in the sixfold division of the Bible:
  • The OT - The King and His coming Kingdom in promise and prophecy
  • The 4 Gospels - The King and His Kingdom offered and rejected
  • The Acts - The King and His Kingdom re-offered and rejected, transition to the body of Christ
  • The Pauline Epistles - The Kingdom postponed, the King made Head of the Church
  • The Jewish Epistles - The King and His Kingdom once again at hand
  • The Revelation - The King comes to establish His kingdom on the earth 

 

2. The Jewish character of the book. It is full of Hebrew idioms, expressions, words and phrases, and imagery. The number of OT passages quoted or alluded to in Matthew is 92, Hebrews is 102, but Revelation is 285!

3. Revelation is a book of PROPHECY (Rev. 1:3; 22:7,10,18-19). The body of Christ is not the subject of prophecy but a great mystery that was hid from the prophets and was first revealed to and through the apostle Paul (Rom. 16:25; Eph. 3:5,9; Col. 1:26). 
4. The vantage point from which John writes the book is the future Day of the LORD (1:10). The Spirit transported him past the Grace Age into the tribulation period (and beyond) to be an eyewitness of the things he was to write. 
5. The promises given to the 7 churches are clearly for tribulation saints. The Bible does not limit the use of the word "church" to the present age (Acts 7:38). Does the body of Christ have to overcome in order to have right to the tree of life and not be hurt of the second death (2:7,11)?
6. Jesus Christ is presented throughout this book in accordance with prophecy and not the revelation of the mystery (Rom. 16:25). He is seen as the Great High Priest and the coming King of kings, not the Head of the church. 
7. The WHOLE book was sent to the seven churches and they were told to KEEP the things in it (Rev. 1:3,11). Are you trying to keep the instruction of 14:9-12 and 22:14 for example?
 
There is more evidence than this but I think these 7 points are suffcient for any thinking person that is not totally blinded by religious tradition to see that Revelation is not about the body of Christ. All scripture is FOR us but it was not all written TO us or ABOUT us! 

 
 
Rightly dividing the Word is the goal of this article, and it is an indispensable key to proper understanding of the Bible. The abundance of scriptural evidence detailed in the third section makes it very clear that Revelation is doctrine for Israel, which was written to Jews who believed in Jesus Christ, by an apostle of the circumcision, for direct application in the prophetic "kingdom" dispensation. At the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple, God placed that dispensation in abeyance in 70 AD, to be resumed in the future tribulation.

The entire book of Revelation, including chapters 1-3, is deeply rooted in Old Testament prophecy. It is doctrinally aligned with the epistles of Peter, James, John, and Jude, all of whom were apostles of the circumcision, as well as to the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Hebrews, and the Old Testament.

The dispensation of grace in which we now live is revealed in Romans through Philemon, our Apostle Paul's letters to the Gentiles, with Acts being the book of transition between the two dispensations.

Source:  The Seven Churches of Revelation
Matthew McGee http://www.matthewmcgee.org/7church.html
 
 

15 comments:



  1. Yes, that's what many pre-tribulation-rapture teachers say
    , and I was influenced too by them for many years, but after I discovered the true Gospel of Grace in 2015 I learned that also the first three chapters of the book of Revelation are not about the Body of Christ.

    I learned the pre-tribulation-rapture doctrine from Hal Lindsey and the late Tim LaHaye through their books in 1984 and later I discovered (Dutch) end times magazines and they all teach that doctrine of the first three chapters of Revelation that are (supposedly) about the Body of Christ, but after I discovered the Gospel of Grace I started to dislike those magazines, because they all have a December 'Christmas' release, and I learned that 'Christmas' has nothing to do with the birth of our Lord and Savior JESUS Christ, but everything with the birth of Tammuz (in the Bible) and the worship of the Babylonian 'sungod', organized by the Roman Catholic church.

    So I became more critical of those magazines, and when I finally learned that the entire book of Revelation is not about us, I canceled my subscription to those magazines.

    I don't need them anymore, because Paul is my teacher

    I learned that mostly thanks to Robert Breaker.

    Thanks to the late Tim LaHaye I believe that the rapture will happen before the fulfillment of Ezechiel 38/39, because that's about Israel and has nothing to do with the Body of Christ.

    The Body of Christ was a MYSTERY and ONLY revealed by our Lord JESUS to Paul and NO ONE ELSE!
    So the apostle John DID NOT KNOW ABOUT IT when he wrote the book of Revelation!
    But God-the Lord JESUS did give him a GLIMPSE of us (the Body of Christ) and that's in Revelation 19:4

    Revelation 19:14 King James Version
    14 And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

    Those armies (hosts in the Geneva Bible) are us!!!
    John didn't know that, but of course now he knows.
    The entire phenomenon of the Body of Christ (I don't use the word 'church') is nothing but a MIRACLE!

    The fact that we are saved is a MIRACLE.
    We used to be outsiders, but 'thanks' to the fact that Israel REJECTED their own Messiah, we could become saved.

    After the rapture our Lord JESUS will continue with his own people, and of course you know that.
    There's NOTHING that needs to be fulfilled before the rapture will occur.

    Everything that's happening now is what Satan is doing, and of course he's is opposed by JESUS, because He's the restrainer through the Holy Spirit within HIS Body of Christ.

    That's why we NEED to get OUT OF THE WAY, or else the rest of the prophecies concerning Israel and the world can't be fulfilled!
    The pretribulation-rapture (pre-Jacob's Trouble-rapture) is a PROPHETIC NECESSITY!
    And of course you know that already.

    ===


    Avatar
    NTEB Mod Hans S • an hour ago

    Well yes, but we do see the Church Age in total form chapters 1-3, and then we reappear in Revelation 19 at the Marriage of the Lamb to us, the Bride!
    1

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Hans S NTEB • 10 minutes ago

    Please read this article without prejudice because it's from a brother who believes in the pre-tribulation-rapture: The Seven Churches of Revelation
    Matthew McGee http://www.matthewmcgee.org/7church.html

    ReplyDelete


  2. Sister Nancy, we're not the Bride of JESUS
    : we are HIS BODY and He's the head of THE BODY OF CHRIST.

    Saved Israel will be the Bride.

    When we come back with our leader JESUS we'll witness that one third of God's people in the land of Israel will acknowledge WHO JESUS is: THEIR MASHIACH=MESSIAH=CHRIST!

    Zechariah 13:8-9 King James Version

    8 And it shall come to pass, that in all the land, saith the Lord, two parts therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left therein.

    9 And I will bring the third part through the fire, and will refine them as

    silver is refined, and will try them as gold is tried: they shall call

    on my name, and I will hear them: I will say, It is my people: and they

    shall say, The Lord is my God.

    Zechariah 12:9-14 King James Version

    9 And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.

    10 And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of

    Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look

    upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one

    mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one

    that is in bitterness for his firstborn.

    11 In that day shall there be a great mourning in Jerusalem, as the mourning of Hadadrimmon in the valley of Megiddon.

    12 And the land shall mourn, every family apart; the family of the house of

    David apart, and their wives apart; the family of the house of Nathan

    apart, and their wives apart;

    13 The family of the house of Levi apart, and their wives apart; the family of Shimei apart, and their wives apart;

    14 All the families that remain, every family apart, and their wives apart.

    Revelation 1:7 King James Version

    7 Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which

    pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him.

    Even so, Amen.

    "every eye shall see him" AT ONCE is not possible on a globe earth, but it is possible on a flat and round earth with a firmament.

    Only Revelation 19:14 mentions the members of the Body of Christ AFTER the rapture and at the time of the Second Coming of JESUS Christ:

    Revelation 19:14 King James Version

    14 And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

    That beautiful picture refers to this verse.....that's JESUS with US, the saved members of the Body of Christ.
    Download it and rename it into 'JESUS returning'

    A blessed (whatever) time of the day!

    ===


    Avatar
    Hans S Nancy Drew • 7 hours ago

    Thanks for treating me as a BROTHER......SISTER Nancy!
    See you soon at the Judgment Seat of Christ, because anyone who will be there IS SAVED.
    Others go to the Great White Throne Judgment and that's REALLY BAD.
    We will be there too, but as co-judges of the the Lord JESUS!
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fe296a75360416752c8be9b7dfb481072fd419483275db159c598e3670cf807f.png

    Edit

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Nancy Drew Hans S • 7 hours ago

    My pleasure... Brother Hans. My wish is that we can stay united because as we both know the lost have a horrible future if they dont come to Jesus. Our time is running out. Thank you for that beautiful picture of the Bride returning with King Jesus. Wow. That would look beautiful on my wall! Jesus loves you and I love you too Hans! Jesus has us in the palm of his hand. Never forget that. Have a blessed night. Rest in the Lord. ........ND

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've read that article and this is what I believe: at Pentecost the Body of Christ DID NOT YET EXIST.
    Pentecost was for the JEWS and NOT for the GENTILES!
    Paul calls himself SEVERAL times the apostles of the Gentiles.
    Conclusion: the Body of Christ started with the salvation by JESUS of Paul.
    Paul was the only one and the first who revealed this MYSTERY, the Body of Christ.
    As a former atheist I totally dislike the word 'church'.
    Unfortunately this word is in both the Geneva Bible and the KJV.
    I'm Dutch and the Dutch word for 'church' (kerk) can only be found in the Dutch CATHOLIC 'bible'.
    In the Dutch PROTESTANT Bible we read the English word for ASSEMBLY.
    So local gatherings of saved believers in the Lord JESUS are assemblies or congregations.
    The word 'church' has associations with CHURCH BUILDINGS, CHURCH BELLS, CHURCH TOWERS etc. as if the Body of Christ is characterized by such buildings, but I can assure you that when I was an atheist I didn't want anything to do with it.....and JESUS...because I thought (like so many people do) that JESUS and 'churches' (church buildings) belong to each other.
    How tragic!
    The first gatherings of saved believers in the Lord JESUS were AT HOME!
    But religious people always try to change it into something else.
    The best gatherings I've had in my life were at the HOME (large former farmhouse) of a fellow believer in JESUS.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b8c3bd50ce6b6e2f0cf706bd9ccd772524f8d2802e00ca9738ac8c3c309ec4ce.jpg

    ===


    Avatar
    Sherry Hans S • 8 hours ago

    Excellent. Here is another article
    https://www.churchgrowth.cc/Seven_Churches_of_Revelation.htm

    ReplyDelete
  4. OF COURSE the book of Revelation is FOR us, as is the ENTIRE Bible, but it's not said TO us, but to Israel and to those who will be on earth after the rapture.

    Our sense of urgency for the lost should be the KNOWLEDGE about something MUCH WORSE than the great tribulation: the LAKE OF FIRE!

    We ALL deserve to go there and we ALL can be SAVED from that fate by God's UNDESERVED Gift of Grace through FAITH ALONE in the BLOOD of JESUS that was shed for the REMISSION of our SINS and His RESURRECTION from the dead, three days later.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omS7QP5x--U

    ===


    Avatar
    BuffaloBillyT Hans S • 10 hours ago

    While Revelation is Daniel's 70th week and the key to bringing to fruition Daniel 9:27, it is indeed for the Church to know so that we can take from the prophecies of this book, hopefully get a sense of urgency for the lost, and ramp up our witnessing to them and our lost family members. Yes, the Church will noticeably be absent during this time span, but almost the entire population of the planet earth, which will be about 99% gentile, will enter this time of devastation. All of the Holy Bible is for all people all of the time as it is God's good will that non should perish. Shalom, BuffaloBilly

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Lord JESUS wasn't addressing us in the book of Revelation!

    Take for example this:

    Revelation 3:12 King James Version

    12 Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.

    This is not meant for saved members of the Body of Christ!

    Rightly dividing the Word is the goal of this article, and it is an indispensable key to proper understanding of the Bible. The abundance of scriptural evidence detailed in the third section makes it very clear that Revelation is doctrine for Israel, which was written to Jews who believed in Jesus Christ, by an apostle of the circumcision, for direct application in the prophetic "kingdom" dispensation. At the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple, God placed that dispensation in abeyance in 70 AD, to be resumed in the future tribulation.

    The entire book of Revelation, including chapters 1-3, is deeply rooted in Old Testament prophecy. It is doctrinally aligned with the epistles of Peter, James, John, and Jude, all of whom were apostles of the circumcision, as well as to the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Hebrews, and the Old Testament.

    The dispensation of grace in which we now live is revealed in Romans through Philemon, our Apostle Paul's letters to the Gentiles, with Acts being the book of transition between the two dispensations.

    Source: The Seven Churches of Revelation
    Matthew McGee http://www.matthewmcgee.org/7church.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies


    1. The book of Revelation has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
      to do with the BODY OF CHRIST which you confuse with the 7 'churches' of Revelation 1-2.
      Geoffrey Grider also teaches this and he's wrong about it.
      And because you are wrong about this, you have a wrong view on the time we're living in.
      And why do you greet me with 'Shalom'?
      Are you a JEW?
      If I believe I'm dealing with a fellow saved believer in the Lord JESUS Christ I always say 'Our JESUS is with us!'.

      ===

      BuffaloBillyT Hans S • an hour ago

      Yes, Hans, but the letters to the Churches are addressed to us because they are part of "the things which are". Recall that the Church is not raptured until 4:1. Your source is wrong about this. Chap. 1..."The things which thou hast seen"...Chaps. 2-3..."the things which are"...Chaps.4-22..."the things which shall be hereafter". (Rev 1:19).
      Shalom, BuffaloBilly

      Delete
  6. Revelation 3 is absolutely NOT about the 'protestant church' and that Roman Catholic word 'church' is only to be found in the Geneva Bible and the King James Bible and in the Dutch ROMAN CATHOLIC 'bible', but NOT in the Dutch PROTESTANT Bible, because then the Dutch word for 'ASSEMBLY' is used.

    William Tyndale was very wise and he used the word CONGREGATION in his translation of the New Testament, and unfortunately the translators of the later Geneva Bible and the later King James Bible used the CATHOLIC word 'church' again.

    The 'Dutch KJV' is the "Statenvertaling' (States translation) of 1637 and you will NOT find the Dutch word for 'church' (kerk) in that PROTESTANT translation.

    But you will find it in the Dutch CATHOLIC 'bible'.

    And when JESUS said that He will come like a thief in the night He was NOT referring to the rapture!

    The Day of Christ vs The Day of the Lord https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhlkUxAVaSk

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/54d4dc62570898d67489959e0eaf91f92ce558a9cca22db3672f5b42e0e478fe.png

    ===


    Avatar
    BuffaloBillyT Phil • 7 hours ago

    We are commanded to be watchful. This is given to the Church of Sardis in Rev 3. The Church of Sardis is a typology of the Protestant church and if you read the text, it really describes today's Protestant churches. The command to be watchful or to watch is given about 20 times in scripture and is mostly New Testament. Is this dogmatic...no. But it is something to be keenly aware of. There is a crown for watching...2 Tim 4:8. This is the crown that JESUS warns the faithful Church of Philadelphia to "see that no man take thy crown" (Rev 3:11). Preterism and any rapture doctrine other than a pre-trib rapture allow a man's crown for watching to be taken from him...especially if he is ignorant of that particular verse. Another piece of scripture has JESUS warning that he will come like a "thief in the night". Now this is not the 2nd coming because scripture says that "every eye shall see him". Therefore, this must be the rapture where he comes like a thief in the night. To those who are watching, this will not happen; to those who are asleep at the wheel or don't believe in the rapture...they will miss this. Study the Galileean Wedding ceremony and it is a picture of the rapture. It is not what I say, Phil...it is what scripture says so I reckon the succinct answer to your question is yes. Shalom, BuffaloBilly

    ReplyDelete


  7. No, I'm not debating semantics
    and the Catholic word 'church' was one of the reasons why I was an atheist, because I associated the word 'church' with CHURCH BUILDINGS, CHURCH BELLS, CHURCH TOWERS, CHURCH ORGANS, CHURCH PEWS, CHURCH PEOPLE which have NOTHING to do with JESUS!
    And now during 'corona' it shows how WORTHLESS 'churches' are because most of them are CLOSED, and those that are open have to abide by the SATANIC corona rules.

    JESUS comes as a thief in the night for the UNSAVED!

    Every eye shall see Him is ONLY possible on the Biblical STATIONARY flat and round earth with a firmament and not on the Roman Catholic, Helio(Helios is sun-worship)centric spinning globe in 'space'.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2WgBnYIrog

    Your interpretation of the Holy Spirit is wrong and the Holy Spirit is JESUS in spiritual capacity.

    Edit

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Phil BuffaloBillyT • 35 minutes ago

    I don't think those unaware will be penalized with exclusion. Brand new believers might barely even comprehend what happened on the cross, but they are part of the body of Christ.


    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Hans S Phil • 3 minutes ago

    What are 'brand new believers?
    Either we are SAVED or UNSAVED and MANY unsaved are also BELIEVERS!

    ===


    Avatar
    BuffaloBillyT Hans S • 42 minutes ago

    The word that translates as "congregation" also translates as "church". The words "congregation", "Church", and "assembly all mean the same thing. You are debating semantics. Revelation 3 has four churches in it: Thyatira is the Catholic church; Sardis is the Protestant church; Philadelphia is the faithful Church of believers that gets raptured; Laodicea is the apostate church of men that infests the Tribulation. In the 2nd coming of JESUS, scripture says that "Every eye shall see Him...". When JESUS comes like a thief in the night, that can only be the rapture. You rely too much on what others teach...rely on the Holy Spirit. Shalom, BuffaloBilly

    ReplyDelete


  8. It makes sense to JESUS Christ.

    Catholics are also believers and they are UNSAVED, to give an example.

    ARE YOU SAVED from having to burn forever in God's lake of fire?

    ===


    Avatar
    Phil BuffaloBillyT • an hour ago

    I don't think those unaware will be penalized with exclusion. Brand new believers might barely even comprehend what happened on the cross, but they are part of the body of Christ.

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    BuffaloBillyT Phil • 18 minutes ago

    That is a good point and has to be considered. Babes in Christ would clearly have to get a pass. John refers to them as "little children in 1 John. But John also addresses young men and fathers and to these God might hold to a higher standard. "To whom much is given, much is required". Thanks for the input. Shalom, BuffaloBilly

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Hans S BuffaloBillyT • 2 minutes ago

    1 John is not addressed to the saved members of the Body of Christ.
    Romans through Philemon is addressed to the saved members of the Body of Christ and we should read the entire Bible from this perspective.

    Edit

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    Hans S Phil • 29 minutes ago

    What are 'brand new believers?
    Either we are SAVED or UNSAVED and MANY unsaved are also BELIEVERS!

    Edit

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar
    BuffaloBillyT Hans S • 18 minutes ago

    This makes no sense, Hans.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anyone who is SAVED knows that it's about the content of the VERY SIMPLE Gospel of Grace, which we can read in 1 Corinthians 15:1-4.

    And JESUS Christ used and uses the flat earth TRUTH to SAVE sinners and this is just one example:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWwhLO-nkBw

    ===



    Avatar
    bblaze David Brooks • a day ago

    "He who endures to the END shall be SAVED". - Jesus Christ

    Enduring unto the end of this life in a Christ-like continuous lifestyle of Holiness is that sweet blessed assurance.


    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Hans S bblaze • 17 hours ago

    If you believe things like this you're NOT saved.
    Matthew 10:22 King James Version

    22 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved

    The Lord JESUS was talking to His own people and not to the saved members of the Body of Christ who didn't yet exist when He spoke these things.
    The apostle Paul revealed the Mysterious Body of Christ AFTER the death, burial and resurrection of the Lord JESUS and AFTER His ascension and after the pouring out of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2 and AFTER the Lord JESUS saved him and sealed him with the Holy Spirit.
    You believe in the wrong gospel, which will be the right gospel AFTER the rapture of the Body of Christ, seven years prior to the Second Coming of the Lord JESUS Christ.
    1

    Edit

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bblaze Hans S • 14 hours ago

      I don't need my salvation validated from anyone but JESUS. I know that I have the REAL THING, so I sleep peacefully at night knowing that i TRULY Know JESUS CHRIST . The King who saves us out of practicing sin. JESUS saved me out of many sins and I am so thankful to Him for causing me to live and desire a holy lifestyle.
      1

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Hans S bblaze • 10 hours ago

      "I don't need my salvation validated from anyone but JESUS"

      And WHO gave us the apostle Paul?

      JESUS!


      Edit

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      SouthernBelle bblaze • 14 hours ago

      That's true... you don't need anyone to validate your salvation. But you have brothers and sisters in Christ on this site trying to help you with a certain wisdom you clearly lack, and that is the wisdom of rightly dividing scripture. You apply verses to a people to which they do not apply. A wise man listens to instruction... yet you blow people off and talk about your holy lifestyle. So, let me ask you a question... if Matthew 10:22 applies directly to YOU, then doesn't the WHOLE chapter apply to you also? Do you go only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel and preach the kingdom of heaven as you are told in v.5-6? Do you heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, and cast out lepers as v. 8 tells you to do? When you go the Jews preaching, do you take money? Your wallet? Your coat? Your shoes? I hope not! Because that's holy living for those Jesus sends to proclaim the Gospel of the kingdom! If you're gonna do it right, you'd better get crackin'!

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      David Brooks bblaze • a day ago

      Well, congrats on giving me a scripture anyway. I been waiting a long time for that.

      Matthew 24:13, right? But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.

      This quote is for people in the time of Jacob's trouble. (But you knew that). The problem with your position is WORKS, my friend. You can not get a Holy God's approval by your works -------> during the age of GRACE which we currently (but rapidly closing) in. Ever heard that term before called, grace? I hope so. Because it does not seem to be in the Post Tribulationits' dictionary. But I know what is in your dictionary.

      Wrath
      Guillotines
      Beheadings
      Doom, Gloom,
      Judgement
      Day of trouble, etc.

      Are you sure you know what god you are pursuing? Because Allah's disciples love getting their heads chopped off with pleasure.

      Food for thought.
      1

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar

      Delete
    2. BuffaloBillyT bblaze • a day ago • edited

      Ever think to stop and read the context? JESUS is talking about the end of the Tribulation and it is directed to the Jews...not the Church. Notice that the next verse in Matthew and Mark both talk about the abomination of desolation...which has nothing to do with the Church, but everything to do with the temple in Jerusalem. Got to get your scriptures right, friend. Shalom, BuffaloBilly
      1

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      SouthernBelle bblaze • a day ago

      He was preparing the Jews for the tribulation that they would go through if they had accepted Him as their Messiah then! That has been put on hold for a time while the (primarily Gentile) church is being built. When the building of the church is complete, the tribulation will come for the children of Israel AT THAT TIME and this verse you quote (Matt 10:22) will apply to the generation who goes through it, as it was meant to be applied. How does this not make sense to you?
      4

      Reply

      Share ›

      Avatar
      BuffaloBillyT David Brooks • a day ago

      Shalom David, I believe that scripture teaches us that we get that which is where our faith is. His faith is in enduring the Tribulation so The Lord will give them that. There is a crown for watching for the rapture, the crown of righteousness in 2 Tim 4:8. He will not receive this crown... and it is the only crown that JESUS warns the faithful Church of Philadelphia (those faithful believers watching for the rapture) to protect... "see that no man take thy crown". I believe that he is saved, just ill-informed. Shalom Brother, BB

      1
      1

      Reply

      Share ›

      Avatar
      Hans S BuffaloBillyT • 17 hours ago

      No, he's not yet saved and that's why he's against the pre-tribulation-rapture.

      The pre-trib-rapture is our blessed HOPE and he doesn't have this HOPE and also not the BLESSING from this HOPE and that's the LORD JESUS Himself who gave us this HOPE through our apostle Paul:

      Titus 2:13 King James Version

      13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ

      Edit

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      BuffaloBillyT Hans S • 9 hours ago

      Hans, The fact that a Believer has a differing interpretation of doctrine or scripture does not indicate salvation or the lack of it. I surely believe that you are saved, but you believe in the flat earth theory which to me is merely a "cunningly devised fable" (2 Pet 1:16). Don't be so hard on those who disagree with you. Shalom, BuffaloBilly

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar

      Delete
    3. Hans S BuffaloBillyT • 6 hours ago

      The fact that the earth is flat has nothing to do with salvation, and neither is your belief in the earth as a spinning ball in 'space' about salvation, but if someone mixes the kingdom gospel for Israel with the grace Gospel of Paul he or she is not saved.

      Paul calls people accursed who do this.

      Galatians 1:8

      But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

      Galatians 1:9

      As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed

      Edit

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      BuffaloBillyT Hans S • 2 hours ago

      If that person mixes the kingdom gospel with the gospel of salvation intentionally, then you are correct. But if it is done in ignorance, which I think is the case here, then that is another story. Hans, to you and me, the shape of the earth may not be a salvation issue, but to an unbeliever, it may be so we should never consider anything that does not involve salvation to not be a salvation issue. The lost have all kinds of unbelief and doubts that we need to address. UFOs are not a salvation issue, but I have been asked in the past if they are in the Bible and did JESUS die for the sins of the occupants. We have to have these things reconciled within us if we are to be effective witnesses. Now my point in bringing up the flat earth theory that you hold was not to debate it, it was to show you how we you and I differ in doctrine and I have not considered you to be unsaved despite this difference.
      As I said, don't be so hard on this guy as he may not know what he is saying or that he is misusing scripture.
      Shalom, BuffaloBilly

       

34 comments:

  1. Hans NTEB • 10 minutes ago •

    You recently said 'I'm starting to think you're a Calvinist' to me.
    And now you treat SB the same.
    SB is not a Calvinist and the same goes for me.
    Now let's go back in time together and it's the year (let's say) 1570.
    The most popular Bible in English was the Bible that was made in Geneva, Switzerland, first published in 1560.
    The KJV didn't yet exist and the US didn't yet exist.

    British colonization of the Americas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_colonization_of_the_Americas

    There were people back then who got saved by hearing or reading the words from the Geneva Bible.
    To them there was no need for a newer or 'better' Bible.
    This Bible was NOT produced by Jean (he was a Frenchman) 'John' Calvin but by several men INCLUDING John Calvin.

    The Holy Bible – Geneva Edition
    1st Printing, 1st Edition in 1560
    Given back to the people so all may understand

    The Geneva Bible was first printed in Geneva, Switzerland, by refugees from England, fleeing the persecution of Protestants by Roman Catholic Queen “Bloody” Mary.
    Many copies were smuggled back into England at great personal risk. In later years, when Protestant-friendly Queen Elizabeth took the throne, printing of the Geneva Bible moved back to England. The Geneva Bible was produced by John Calvin, John Knox, Myles Coverdale, John Foxe, and other Reformers. It is the version that William Shakespeare quotes from hundreds of times in his plays, and the first English Bible to offer plain roman-style type in some of its early printings.

    The Geneva Bible was the first Bible taken to America, brought over on the
    Mayflower… it is the Bible upon which early America and its government was founded (certainly not the King’s of England’s Bible!) The Geneva Bible was also the first English Bible to break the chapters of scripture into numbered verses, and it was the first true “Study Bible” offering extensive commentary notes in the margins. It was so accurate and popular, that a half-century later, when the King James Bible came out… it retained more than 90% of the exact wording of the Geneva Bible.

    More: https://greatsite.com/shop/?yith_wcan=1&product_cat=facsimile-reproductions

    The Geneva Bible was the “Bible of the Protestant Reformation”, and the Bible of the Puritans and Pilgrims. It was the first Bible taken to America, brought over on the Mayflower. The Geneva Bible is the Bible upon which America was founded. You can imagine, most early American colonists, who were fleeing the religious oppression of the Anglican Church (Church of England), wanted nothing to do with the King James Bible of the Anglican Church!
    Textually, the Geneva Bible offered a number of radical never-before-seen changes: It was the first Bible in English to add numbered verses to each chapter of scripture. Also, the Geneva was the first Bible to introduce easier-to-read “Roman Style Typeface” rather than the “Gothic Blackletter Style Typeface” which had been used exclusively in earlier Bibles. Another curious innovation; the Geneva was the first “Study Bible” with extensive commentary notes in the margins.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Geneva Bible is the version quoted from hundreds of times by William Shakespeare in his plays. Also called the “Breeches Bible”, the Geneva Bible is the only Bible ever able to outsell and exceed the popularity of the King James Bible, as it did in the early 1600’s until its printing ceased in 1644. In fact, one of the greatest ironies of history, is that Protestants of all denominations today embrace the King James Version of the Bible (which reads 90% the same as the Geneva), even though the King James Version is not a Protestant Bible (it’s Anglican / Church of England). Most Protestants have never even heard of the Bible of their own heritage: the Geneva Bible. It was produced by John Calvin, John Knox, Myles Coverdale, John Foxe, & other English refugees in ever-neutral Geneva, Switzerland… fleeing the persecution of Roman Catholic Queen “Bloody” Mary in England. Mary would not tolerate the Protestant Geneva Bible, which proclaimed the Pope an “antichrist” in its commentary notes.

      King James didn't like this Bible and he wanted a 'better' Bible, but most people in England back then didn't agree with him and the Geneva Bible remained popular after the publication of the King James Bible 1611, much to King James's dismay and the Anglican church.

      They even published a King James Bible WITH FOOTNOTES to try to persuade the people to buy the KJV, but did also didn't work.

      So eventually they FORBADE the printing of the Geneva Bible in England.

      That's a strange way to get rid of the 'competition' don't you think?
      The 'Pilgrim Fathers' first fled to my country, the Netherlands, because they wanted to be FREE and they didn't want to live under the rule of King James and 'his' Bible.

      And after some time a portion of them decided to emigrate to the 'New World' that was already colonized in the east by England (and other countries) and the Bibles they brought with them was the Geneva Bible.

      Now suppose there were already KJV-onlyists there who would have told them 'Only the KJV is the right and perfect word of God!.
      I guess they would have fled to another part of the world.

      ===

      SouthernBelle • 5 hours ago • edited

      God loved His Son before the foundation of the world...
      John 14:24 - Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me: for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world.

      Jesus Christ was foreordained (chosen, appointed) before the foundation of the world...
      1 Peter 1 - 19. But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: 20. Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you

      Delete
    2. He chose us (His body) IN HIM (the Head) before the foundation of the world -
      Eph 1 - 3. Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: 4. According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: 5. Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,
      2 Tim 1:8-9 - Be not thou therefore ashamed of the testimony of our Lord, nor of me his prisoner: but be thou partaker of the afflictions of the gospel according to the power of God; 9. Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began,

      4

      Reply

      Share ›

      Avatar
      NTEB Mod SouthernBelle • 5 hours ago

      Have you always been a Calvinist?

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      SouthernBelle NTEB • 5 hours ago

      How is this "calvinist"??? What here in these scriptures do you refute, Geoffrey? Do I misunderstand the plain English that I read here? Please explain.
      1

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      NTEB Mod SouthernBelle • 5 hours ago

      I have refuted Calvinism soooooooo many times....you were there for the 3 part series we did just a few months ago. I haven't the energy to explain it yet again, believe what you want to believe. And yes, you misunderstand the "plain english" because you are reading it in the light of Calvinism.
      1

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      SouthernBelle NTEB • 5 hours ago

      If I misunderstand what I read here in these verses I referenced, you should explain them to me instead of just calling me a calvinist. I am not a calvinist. I have never studied the teachings of John Calvin. I'm just reading what the verses say. If they sound like something you have read from Calvin, I can't help that. If I misunderstand these verses, I'd love to have them explained to me so I can determine if they mean something other than what they say.
      2

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Victor SouthernBelle • 4 hours ago

      I would just like to ask you do you believe in the predestination of the damned? Do you deny "whosoever will" ? Do you deny man's free will to the extent that he could even resist the grace of God if he chose to do so?

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar

      Delete
    3. NTEB Mod Victor • an hour ago

      "Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye." Acts 7:51 (KJB)

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      SouthernBelle NTEB • 4 minutes ago

      Who is Stephen speaking of in Acts 7:51? Israel! The nation Israel could and DID resist the Holy Ghost time and time again in the OT. Those chosen IN HIM, as Ephesians 1:4 and 2 Tim 1:9 tells us... CHOSEN IN HIM, not SAVED yet (I never said saved).... but those chosen in Him before the foundation of the world can NOT resist the Holy Ghost and do receive Him. That's one of the huge differences in OT/trib Israel and individuals saved in the grace age. I figured you knew this.

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      NTEB Mod SouthernBelle • 5 hours ago

      You are a follower of MacArthur, that makes you a Calvinist, and I have already explained it, to you, many times.
      1

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      SouthernBelle NTEB • 5 hours ago

      No, I'm not. I read the scriptures for MYSELF. I am absolutely astonished at how you have handled this discussion.
      3

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      NTEB Mod SouthernBelle • 4 hours ago

      MacArthur is a heretic and his followers are deceived. And with that, I'm out...

      Delete
  2. Disqus is controlled by Satan!

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/28a57c3bbc6aa6c75c7ff14a729e3d6424937c2b8678d14190c00af312c93722.png

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/23dc45105c41aeea65fc9dfa4e3c6e725af24cea8c7c90c77c73621526e2f133.png

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/750300c9e4eb09c51b3993b1e23b57c4eddf6d43847557cf2e23160a22856bba.png

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b4237290878e3fe33f8fcc711d7757f04266c9ef597bcbbeea6bf60d4a87b5ac.png

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/424202228fd5f990474bbf62c09b78765b443606742f4de585f2841ebc6b261e.png


    Avatar
    Hans Hans • 17 minutes ago

    Disqus says 'We received your request for review' which is a LIE, because I didn't request ANYTHING.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Disqus doesn't want people to know this:
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c856160f73b7160b8583263d183973a3bc1cf4cf61edfce521962a41e2977757.png

    I posted this and a second later it was flagged as 'spam' or as 'pending', so it's clear to me that Disqus is controlled by the devil.

    ===



    Avatar
    Hans • 14 minutes ago

    Whistleblower: Hospitals Killing For Organs, "This is Absolutely Evil And A Crime Against Humanity!"

    https://ezekiel38departure.blogspot.com/2022/01/davos-in-catacombs-klaus-schwabs-secret.html?showComment=1642686116251#c6351050511826889663

    ReplyDelete
  4. Emperor Nero already began in his time to try to deceive the believers in the Lord JESUS by using a counterfeit of Christian gatherings so that he could arrest them and kill them.

    The Vatican is built on the same place where they threw believers in the Lord JESUS for the hungry lions.

    The whole purpose of the Holocaust (that word is only found in the Catholic 'bible' and in the Protestant Bible the words used are 'burnt offering') was that a Jewish state could be created in 'Palestine' so that in the future Satan could more easily kill all the Jews at one place, and the Vatican and the Jesuits planned everything from the sinking of the 'Titanic' (it was the sister ship Olympic that sunk https://ezekiel38departure.blogspot.com/2021/12/did-titanic-really-sink-or-was-it.html ) to the establishment of the Vatican bank, the Federal Reserve, the 'first world war', the 'great depression', the rise to power of Jesuit Priest Joseph 'Stalin' and the Catholic dictators Mussolini and Hitler and Franco, while in the meantime FDR was a 33rd degree Freemason and Truman too and also the British leader Churchill, and 33rd degree Freemasons are direct secret servants of the Vatican, and subsequently they used the fake 'atomic bombs' and the fake 'nukes' of the former Soviet Union to start the hoax called the 'Cold war' in order to create fear, and in this situation the Jewish state came into being and its name was not given by Theodore Roosevelt, but by the socialist leaders of Israel themselves during a meeting when they were discussing what name the Jewish state would get, and they couldn't come up with a proper name until someone said 'why don't we just call it Israel?' and Ben-Gurion decided that this was a good idea, because none of them were religious Jews but secular Zionists.

    I certainly believe that miracles happened during the war of independence and that Israel was not wiped from the map but instead could increase its territory, though they had to wait till the 'six day war' to unite Jerusalem.
    Till that time the US was not a big 'friend' of Israel, and most weapons of the Israelis were non-American, but this changed during the Yom Kippur war of 1973 when the US got more involved and when the war in Vietnam (fought on behalf of the Vatican: https://iuhp.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/avro_manhatten_-_vietnam_why_did_we_go.pdf ) was coming to a close.
    The Israeli leadership cooperates with the Vatican and proof of that is the fact that in Israel many people have been 'vaccinated' several times and that Israel is leading the way among western countries in implementing the 'great reset'.

    Maybe you have forgotten that Poland also ceased to exist as a country and that after the 'first world war' it came into existence again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We're now living in the dispensation of Grace and not in prophetic times, and all the prophecies regarding Israel will be fulfilled after the rapture.

      The next prophecy that will be fulfilled after the rapture is the war of Gog & Magog, Ezekiel 38/39.

      That's why my blog is called ezekiel38departure (it used to be ezekiel38rapture, but Satan blocked that blog, though I can still see it, because I revealed too much'): https://ezekiel38departure.blogspot.com/

      ===


      Terri Horn > Hans • 5 hours ago


      The Roman Catholic Church was not created until 350AD by Constantine. The Jewish people are the ones who demanded Christ be crucified. I doubt the Jews were the ones who manufactured the Holocaust. If not for WWII the NWO would come into being in the '30s. The UN had the entire world divided into 10 regions.
      All things work together for good to those who love God and re called according to his purpose. Romans 8:28. Without the holocaust Israel would not exist. Study the formation of the second birth of Israel and God's miracles are all over the formation of Israel in 1948. You realize it was Theodore Roosevelt who named it Israel. When the form reached Roosevelt the new name for Palestine was left blank and Roosevelt filled in the name. President before Theodore Roosevelt promised Saudi Arabia we would never help the Jews get Palestine back. Because of the horrors of the Holocaust Israel became a nation in less than 24 hours as prophesied in the Bible and one again the only country in the entire world to come back from non existence. First war less then 24 hours against 12 Muslim countries with no army and one tank. Israel WON. God's hands again all over Israel's existence. I think we can thank God for that instead of giving credit to evil.

      Delete
  5. Shannon • 2 days ago • edited

    Hans I must respond to this.
    Paul wrote in Romans 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth
    the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised
    him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10:10For with the heart man
    believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto
    salvation. 10:11For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him
    shall not be ashamed.

    The PAYMENT was made by Jesus- the Gift MUST be ACCEPTED by man- there are no works in acceptance. you are bordering on saying that salvation is automatic based on just reading the words. If 2 people are in a room, both read the words. one accepts them and BELIEVES. one rejects them an walks away- which one ACCEPTED the Gift? or are they now BOTH saved?
    Help me understand your mind, Hans, because this is what it sounds like you are saying.

    5

    Reply

    Share ›

    Avatar
    Hans Shannon • 2 days ago

    I hope you clicked on that link, because it was written by Robert Breaker, Bible teacher and evangelist.
    If Romans 10:9 would the THE Gospel then all people who can't speak will go lost because they cannot confess with their mouth the Lord JESUS.
    What I'm saying is exactly what that short article of Robert Breaker says, so read it and then we can talk further.
    If I put it here then some evil person will flag it as spam, which already happened several times.
    In the past I could always copy-paste that article to here.
    1
    1

    Edit

    Reply

    Share ›
    Avatar

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shannon Hans • 2 days ago

      Dude- Stop putting GOD in BOX. GOD is GOD- He KNOWS what the are thoughts of the mind of EVERY man.

      ARE you saying that JESUS DID NOT KNOW WHAT HE WAS DOING OR SAYING???? That in and of itself is cause for question.....

      Have you been to Robert Breakers Cloud Church website? Have you read the Doctrinal Statement on his site? I read the article, Have you? I AM SAVED_ IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THAT< THEN I HAVE NO MORE TO SAY to this conversation. Please stop your nonsense of causing division. You are only going to have to answer to Jesus at His Judgement Seat. As well as ALL of us will do.

      We all must answer for the words we say and the things we do at the Judgement Seat of Christ. I already have much to answer for. It would be silly for me to add any more evil, don't you think? You would do well to think on these things. I will not any more answer those who only are here to tell me that what I post (FROM the BIBLE ) is wrong. I do not add any private interpretations. And Truly, if the Spirit is leading me, I am answering the Lord, NOT man. I pray only the best for you.

      (This is an answer that applies to all those who are in the same group who are attempting to argue and nit-pick. There is NO place for this in the Body Of Christ.)

      I am not better than anyone on this site. I am a sinner, saved ONLY by the Blood of Jesus Christ. I have done NOTHING to deserve Heaven, EXCEPT to Believe that Jesus Christ Shed His Blood on the Cross to pay a sin-debt that I could NEVER pay. God gave me this FREE-GIFT and I ACCEPTED it. After I accepted, God can NOW look at me through the righteousness of HIS SON, not mine- for mine is as dirty rags. So when you accuse the Brethren of having a wrong view on Salvation, you are really accusing God. Pretty silly accusation, with some pretty serious consequences...(loss of reward, loss of Blessing-loss of peace, loss of joy, doubts of salvation, loss of fruit, etc....)

      ( It is God who is the Judge of our Hearts- the MOST HIGH and HOLY, JUST and MERCIFUL, Most MIGHTY and Full of PITY God- Our Lord and Savior)

      Ephesians 4:3 Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.
      4

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Hans Shannon • 2 days ago

      The fact that you call me 'dude' and not a brother in the Lord JESUS Christ clearly shows how judgemental you are and you're also angry.
      Why are you angry and not a happy saved sinner, saved by God's undeserved Gift of Grace?
      Why does it offend you when I repeat what the apostle Paul says on behalf of the Lord JESUS Christ?
      We only have to believe what 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 says to be saved from eternal damnation and to be sealed with the Holy Spirit.
      I didn't invent that but the Lord JESUS Christ through His servant Paul, and that's why it's in the Bible.
      2
      2

      Edit

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar

      Delete
    2. Shannon Hans • 2 days ago

      Hans, You are not treating us like Brethren, so it is difficult to see you as such. You assume I was angry. You do not know me. Also you seem to discount anything else that the Bible, the Holy Word of God contains. You speak as though if there was a Jew and a Gentile sitting in the same room listening to Jesus speak, that The Gentile would NOT be able to Believe. Or if they were listening to Paul speak, then the Jewish person would not be able to have salvation. This CAN NOT BE. Our GOD is ONE GOD who sent HIS SON to DIE for the ENTIRE World. HIS BLOOD is the BLOOD that SAVES. I am Saved by the Glorious Blood of Jesus. Jesus Christ IS my Best Friend. I DO read my Bible daily. The Holy Spirit DOES dwell within me, OR I would NEVER EVER be able to tell you this. YES I am Rapture ready. Brother Hans- thank you for telling me of your best earthly friend. I am 52, but have lived life enough to be at least 65. And YES- I do share the Gospel wherever I go. The Gospel that saves one man saves ALL men. The difference in the Dispensations given to Peter and to Paul has much to do in How to SPEAK/bring the Gospel to the Israelites who are immersed in the LAW and how to SPEAK/bring the Gospel to the Gentiles who have NO CLUE what the LAW is about during the age we live in (whether it be known as Grace or Church, matters not to me) , as well as the time of Jacobs Trouble. I have read the Old Testament Law multiple times. I have a very good understanding from the point of view of one who has never lived it but can understand what a different and HOLY life they were to lead, and the LOrd has been showing me WHY the 2 different dispensations (gospels)exist. The Same BLOOD saves both Jew and Gentile. Paul tells us in Galations 3:26For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. 3:27For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 3:28There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 3:29And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.
      I am NOW finished with this conversation. If you still have ought to say about how Jesus does not know what He was doing when He came to Earth and then when He had Paul write the letters he did, then that is between you and JESUS, NOT me. I will NOT answer.
      3

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Hans Shannon • 2 days ago

      You keep being unfriendly to me and thanks for telling me your age, but you still suggest you're older and more experienced than me, and it doesn't help to get to know you if you talk to me with a picture of a Lama.

      You don't need to answer, but I pray you will investigate this site: https://doctrine.org/
      1
      1

      Edit

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar

      Delete
    3. 4Given Hans • 19 hours ago

      Dude, I'm telling you that you are a train wreck. You sure do have a god complex determining who is and who is not saved. The people who tolerate you on a daily basis are the real heroes here.
      2

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Hans 4Given • 18 hours ago

      Don't call me 'dude' and I'm not lying about my identity like you and I'm proclaiming the right Gospel, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4.
      If you don't agree with that, then you don't agree with God-the Lord JESUS Christ who gave us this Gospel through the apostle Paul.
      1

      Edit

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      4Given Hans • 18 hours ago

      1 Corinthians 15:1-4 is a summary of the Gospel that Paul taught in Romans. Were you born this stupid or did you take lessons? Have you ever heard of the whole counsel of God? You use a sledgehammer to pound people with the Gospel but you only give them a summation of Paul's teachings. Cheap grace is what you dish out.
      1
      3

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Hans 4Given • 17 hours ago

      I heard that argument before that THE GOSPEL, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 is a 'summary'.
      Is it the Lord JESUS Christ who inspires you to insult me and did He tell you 'you have my special permission to lie about who you are on the internet'?
      What you call 'cheap grace' is an INSULT to God-the Lord JESUS Christ!
      He shed His sinless BLOOD for the forgiveness of our SINS and you call it 'cheap grace'.
      He was buried and He rose from the dead, three day's later and you call it 'cheap grace'.
      You're someone who wants to DO something to get saved and stay saved, as if its about YOU and not about the Lord JESUS.
      1

      Edit

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      4Given Hans • 4 hours ago

      Ever hear of Dietrich Bonhoeffer? In his book, The Cost of Discipleship, Bonhoeffer used the term cheap grace. As defined by Bonhoeffer, cheap grace is an approach to Christianity that only emphasizes the good or easy parts without telling the truth regarding the difficult aspects of it. To leave out the more difficult aspects of repentance, church discipline, confession, discipleship, the cross, or the full story of Christ's life offers an incomplete, "cheap" view of God's grace.

      Your approach is just the opposite of Bonhoeffer's. While salvation by grace is a free gift, if acceptance of that free gift does not result in a changed life, a life changed by Christ (born again), it is cheap grace. The church of Laodicea represents cheap grace.

      Delete
    4. My response to this was immediately 'detected as spam' so that it couldn't be read, but here it is:

      Paul is in the Bible and Bonhoeffer isn't and anyone who adds to THE Gospel, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4, in order to get saved is NOT saved:

      Ephesians 2:8-9 King James Version

      8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God

      9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

      You're very attached to that CATHOLIC word 'church' that doesn't belong in the Bible and in the Netherlands the Dutch word for 'church' (kerk) is only to be found in the Dutch CATHOLIC 'bible'.

      William Tyndale tried to get rid of that word 'church' and in his translation of the New Testament, published in 1537, he used the word CONGREGATION.

      The Dutch word instead of the word 'church' is 'assembly'.

      Of course the Roman Catholic CHURCH hated William Tyndale for that and also the Dutch and the German Protestants, because Martin Luther also used another word for 'church' (Kirche) in his translation of 1545 (Gemeinde, which is almost the same as the Dutch word gemeente, meaning assembly).

      For centuries the Roman Catholic CHURCH had been successful in making the people associate the word 'church' with church BUILDINGS and the only time in the Dutch Protestant Bible that the word 'church' (kerk) is used it refers to a TEMPLE!

      Acts 19:37 Want gij hebt deze mannen hier gebracht, die noch kerkrovers zijn, noch uw godin lasteren. (Dutch States Translation)

      Translation: 37 For thou hast brought here these men, who are neither temple robbers, nor blaspheme thy goddess.

      So in the Dutch Protestant Bible the Dutch word for 'church' (kerk) stands for a temple.

      And that's exactly what Satan and the Catholic church want: that it's about BUILDINGS and INSTITUTIONS and MAN MADE RULES and NOT about what God-the Lord JESUS wants, because a HOLY GATHERING of saved believers in the Lord JESUS can be held ANYWHERE, like out in the open when it's good weather or in a house or a cave or a hired school building, hired whatever building, and of course it's also possible to build a special building, but that shouldn't be called a 'church'.

      It's not about the building but about the PEOPLE!

      But control freaks love buildings because in buildings one can set RULES and if someone doesn't apply to 'the rules' they can say 'LEAVE THE BUILDING, LEAVE THIS CHURCH!'.

      Satan loves church BUILDINGS: people can be locked up in a church and then burned alive!

      That has happened many times in history!

      That is a lot more difficult when people gather in a secret location such as in the forest or in a cave.

      We see that now during the corona TERROR that 'authorities' forbid believers in the Lord JESUS to gather normally in their buildings.

      When I made a video about it in the beginning of the corona terror, in which I said that now is the time that believers in the Lord JESUS should gather IN SECRET it was REMOVED by satanic YouTube.

      What you said about 'The church of Laodicea' as if this applies to this dispensation of GRACE is UNBIBLICAL.

      Revelation is not about the Body of Christhttps://ezekiel38departure.blogspot.com/2022/01/revelation-is-not-about-body-of-christ.html#more

      Delete


  6. You quoted from the apostle Paul who is the only apostle of the Gentiles
    and his Gospel is NOT the same as the Gospel the Lord JESUS proclaimed to His OWN people.

    The Gospel of GRACE by Paul on behalf of the Lord JESUS is for EVERYONE, both Jews and Gentiles and the Gospel of the KINGDOM for ISRAEL is for Israel only. Gentiles may also believe in this Gospel but then they're not part of the Body of Christ, but then they have chosen to follow the Lord JESUS as if they are Jews.

    This also implies they are NOT rapture-ready because they are not a member of the Body of Christ but they've become part of Israel and if you believe like this you may indeed believe you are a Jew.

    But if you want to be rapture-ready then you must believe what Paul preached and DON'T mix it with the Gospel of the Kingdom, which you do, because you don't make a distinction between those two Gospels and you call everybody who believes in the Lord JESUS Christ a 'Christian'.

    I am not a 'Christian': I am created and SAVED by God-the Lord JESUS and I follow Paul on behalf of the Lord JESUS because the Lord JESUS told me so in HIS Bible:

    1 Corinthians 4:16

    Wherefore I beseech you, be ye followers of me.

    1 Corinthians 11:1

    Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.

    Philippians 3:17

    Brethren, be followers together of me, and mark them which walk so as ye have us for an ensample.

    So it's not WRONG to follow the Lord JESUS Christ directly, and not through Paul, but then you must accept that you're not a member of the Body of Christ but a member of Israel and that you won't take part in the rapture and that you have to go through the Time of Jacob's Trouble.

    Those who ARE saved by God's GRACE through FAITH in THE GOSPEL, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 ARE sealed with the Holy Spirit and automatically rapture ready.

    They don't need to look for 'signs of the end times' because signs are for the Jews.

    They know the pre-Times of Jacob's Trouble-rapture, as I call the pre-Tribulation-rapture, MUST happen or else the prophetic word regarding Israel can't be fulfilled.

    They ARE looking for that BLESSED HOPE, the rapture, according to

    Titus 2:13 King James Version
    13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ

    knowing that they are ALWAYS ready, while being awake or asleep and they are encouraged to share this message to everyone, both to fellow believers in the Lord JESUS who aren't saved yet according to the Gospel of Grace and unbelievers.

    So my message to you is: you can't have it both ways!
    Either you are a member of the spiritual NATION of Israel by following the Lord JESUS directly or you are a member of the Body of Christ, indirectly following the Lord JESUS through Paul.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ===



      Matthew 24 has NOTHING to do with the current time we're living in.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxIUpkLi7Ck
      2
      2

      Edit

      Reply

      Share ›

      Avatar
      David Brooks Hans • 2 days ago • edited

      This isn't the first time you said that and this is not the first time I've corrected you and put it in the proper format. And as long as you keep saying this I'm going to keep replying with the same answer.
      Matthew chapter 24 is during the time of Jacob's trouble but we are seeing the climate of Matthew chapter 24 developing right now. The wars in the rumors of wars are happening right now. They will continue after the rapture of the church and only increase in intensity and frequency.

      Now since your thing is arguing sowing discord etc, have at it.
      3

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Hans David Brooks • 2 days ago • edited

      You're not correcting me, David, and you should correct yourself, because if the bible makes it clear that Matthew 24 is NOT about this dispensation of Grace, then it's also not about the 'climate of that chapter' in our present time before the rapture.

      And about your accusation that I so called sow discord: if I sow discord by telling the Biblical truth then you accuse our apostle Paul of the same.
      2
      1

      Edit

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Psalm37 Hans • 2 days ago

      The problem is that you cannot claim to tell biblical truth when it's in fact only your biblical perspective (opinion).
      1

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar

      Delete
    2. Hans Psalm37 • a day ago • edited

      Prove from the Bible that Matthew 24 is for the saved members of the Body of Christ and don't give your own opinion, please.
      I'm waiting.
      3

      Edit

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Psalm37 Hans • 19 hours ago

      Prove that it's not.

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Hans Psalm37 • 19 hours ago

      Who was the Lord JESUS talking to?

      PAGANS? GENTILES? People who don't belong to ISRAEL?

      No, He was ONLY talking to FELLOW JEWS:
      Matthew 24
      King James Version

      https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24&version=KJV

      Edit

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Psalm37 Hans • 12 hours ago

      He was talking to His followers . We are his followers too. No difference. We are all one in Christ.

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Hans Psalm37 • 10 hours ago

      He was talking to His followers and others of His own people: all JEWS!
      He was NOT talking to non-JEWS so you are deliberately distorting history.

      Edit

      Reply

      Share ›
      Avatar
      Psalm37 Hans • 38 minutes ago

      In your eyes, the New Testament talks of two separate, distinct groups of Christians - Jewish Christians and Gentile Christians . But the bible CLEARLY says the following, which you refuse to accept:
      “there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus; and if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise”. Gal 3.28,29
      Hans, these verses not only CLEARLY prove that there are NOT two groups of Christians, but they even tell me that as a Gentile believer, I am actually Abraham’s seed, which makes me a Jew!

      Delete
    3. Disqus flagged my response as spam and here it is (click on it so that you can read it):
      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/617c325fc363e92a9dc95ff910d46ed599b527447602cb7f26413211daedbacb.png

      Delete
    4. I told you before that the Bible itself proves there are two Gospels in the New Testament:

      Galatians 2:7

      King James Version

      7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was
      committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter

      So here we see that there is a Gospel for the uncircumcision = the GENTILES and a Gospel for the circumcision = JEWS.

      Jews who believe in the Lord JESUS according to the teachings of Paul have to adapt to the gentiles
      and Gentiles who believe in the Lord JESUS according to the teachings of the Lord JESUS have to adapt to the Jews, which also means that they WILL BE saved AFTER the rapture, because they are NOT saved according to the Gospel of Grace, and MIXING these two Gospels makes one AUTOMATICALLY NOT YET SAVED.

      ===


      Avatar
      Psalm37 Hans • 8 hours ago

      There is only one gospel , not two. There is only one group of believers of Jesus , we are all born-again , whether Jew or Gentile. But it's no good debating the issue with you , as you can't see it . You are determined to stick to your opinions. I'll just stick to what the bible says.

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. Many people believe that Peter and Paul preached the same Gospel, which isn't true.

      Delete
  8. Galatians 1:1-12
    King James Version

    1 Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father
    , who raised him from the dead;)
    2 And all the brethren which are with me, unto the churches of Galatia:
    3 Grace be to you and peace from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ,
    4 Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the will of God and our Father:
    5 To whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
    6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
    7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
    8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
    9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
    10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.
    11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.
    12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.

    And this is that GOSPEL of the Lord JESUS Christ:

    1 Corinthians 15:1-4
    King James Version

    1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
    2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
    3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
    4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures

    ReplyDelete
  9. Not the day of the Lord but the DAY OF CHRIST.
    2 Thessalonians 2:2
    King James Version

    2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

    The true PROTESTANT translation clearly and plainly states that the DEPARTING = the RAPTURE will happen on de DAY OF CHRIST BEFORE the man of sin is revealed:

    2 Thessalonians 2:1-3
    1599 Geneva Bible (First publication in 1560)

    1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our assembling unto him,

    2 That ye be not suddenly moved from your mind, nor troubled neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter, as it were from us, as though the day of Christ were at hand.

    3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a departing first, and that that man of sin be disclosed, even the son of perdition.

    The STATE SPONSORED Bible of the ANGLICAN CHURCH says SOMETHING ELSE:

    2 Thessalonians 2:1-3
    King James Version

    2 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,

    2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

    3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition




    So where does the CONFUSION comes from?
    The KJV!
    The RAPTURE happens FIRST and THEN the ANTICHRIST will be revealed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tyndale Bible
      2 Thessalonians: Chapter 02 (1534) https://tyndalebible.com/2-thessalonians-chapter-2/

      The seconde Epistle to the Thessalonyans. The .ij. Chapter.

      We beseche you brethren by the commynge of oure lorde Jesu Christ and in that we shall assemble vnto him
      that ye be not sodely moved from youre mynde and be not troubled nether by sprete nether by wordes nor yet by letter which shuld seme to come from vs as though the daye of Christ were at honde.
      Let no ma deceave you by eny meanes for the lorde commeth not excepte ther come a departynge fyrst and that that synfnll man be opened ye sonne of perdicion

      2 Thessalonians 2:1-3
      New Matthew Bible (modernized version) https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Thessalonians+2%3A1-3&version=NMB

      2 We beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and in that we shall assemble unto him, 2 not to be suddenly moved from your mind. And be not troubled, neither by spirit nor by words, nor yet by letter which seems to come from us, as though the day of Christ were at hand. 3 Let no man deceive you by any means. For the Lord comes not unless there come a departing first and that sinful man be revealed – the son of perdition

      So the STATE SPONSORED KJV changed the RAPTURE = DEPARTING into 'a falling away'.

      As soon as the KJV was published King James BANNED the Geneva Bible and he began to persecute its owners and readers.
      This led to the flight of a group of English people to the Protestant Netherlands where they lived for several years.
      A portion of them decided to go to the 'new world' which later would become the USA.
      Of course the Bible they brought with them was NOT the KJV but the Geneva Bible.

      Delete
    2. King James I and the Geneva Bible
      Example of the blackletter version (1608)

      In 1604, the year after he claimed the throne of England in 1603, King James I hosted and presided over a conference pertaining to matters religious, the Hampton Court Conference. While the Geneva Bible was the preferred Bible of Anglican and Puritan Protestants during the Elizabethan Age, King James I disliked the Geneva Bible and made his views clearly known at the conference: "I think that of all [English Bibles], that of Geneva is the worst." Apparently, his distaste for the Geneva Bible was not necessarily caused just by the translation of the text into English, but mostly the annotations in the margins. He felt strongly many of the annotations were "very partial, untrue, seditious, and savoring too much of dangerous and traitorous conceits..." In all likelihood, he saw the Geneva's interpretations of biblical passages as anti-clerical "republicanism", which could imply church hierarchy was unnecessary. Other passages appeared particularly seditious: notably references to monarchs as "tyrants". It followed that the need for a king as head of church and state could be questioned also. James had been dealing with similar issues with the Presbyterian-Calvinist religious leaders back in Scotland, and he wanted none of the same controversies in England. Also, if annotations were in print, readers might believe these interpretations correct and fixed, making it more difficult to change his subjects' minds about the meanings of particular passages.
      Title page of a Geneva Bible Apparently dated 1599 but probably printed circa 1616 to 1625.

      So when towards the end of the conference two Puritans suggested that a new translation of the Bible be produced to unify better the Anglican Church in England and Scotland, James embraced the idea. He could not only be rid of those inconvenient annotations, but he could have greater influence on the translation of the Bible as a whole. He commissioned and chartered a new translation of the Bible which would eventually become the most famous version of the Bible in the history of the English language. Officially known as the Authorized Version to be read in churches, the new Bible would come to bear his name as the so-called King James Bible or King James Version (KJV) elsewhere or casually. The first and early editions of the King James Bible from 1611 and the first few decades thereafter lack annotations, unlike nearly all editions of the Geneva Bible up until that time. Initially, the King James Version did not sell well and competed with the Geneva Bible. Shortly after the first edition of the KJV, King James banned the printing of new editions of the Geneva Bible to further entrench his version. However, Robert Barker continued to print Geneva Bibles even after the ban, placing the spurious date of 1599 on new copies of Genevas which were actually printed circa 1616 to 1625. Despite popular misconception, the Puritan Separatists or Pilgrim Fathers aboard the Mayflower in 1620 brought to North America copies of the Geneva Bible.
      ====
      Psalm37 Hans • 6 hours ago

      Nobody can state dogmatically who exactly the "he" is who "letteth" in 2 Thess 2.7, but one thing is a definite - this "he" is not the AC. In just 4 verses above , (2 Thess 2 .3), it clearly and plainly states that the Day of the Lord (the Rapture) will not come until the man of sin is revealed. FIRST the man of sin is revealed, THEN the Rapture.

      Delete
    3. Now I don't blame the translators of the KJV of this error because this is what the introduction said in the Geneva Bible regarding this passage:

      2 2 He showeth that the day of the Lord shall not come, till there be a departure from the faith, 3 and that Antichrist be revealed, 8 whose destruction he setteth out, 15 and thereupon exhorteth to constancy.

      This is NOT what the BIBLE says, but what a SINNER wrote as an INTERPRETATION of the text.
      Back then they didn't know that there would come a RAPTURE before the revelation of the Antichrist, because they already knew WHO the Antichrist is: the PAPACY and this was stated in one of the footnotes of the original Geneva Bible 1560.
      And they lived CENTURIES before taking into account the rapture made any sense.

      Delete
    4. Hans MaryRoseH • 31 minutes ago

      Departing is the rapture.

      You BELIEVE what you want to believe and I BELIEVE what I want to believe.
      ===

      Avatar
      Hans MaryRoseH • 31 minutes ago

      Departing is the rapture.
      You BELIEVE what you want to believe and I BELIEVE what I want to believe.

      Delete
  10. Replies
    1. Barbara Wilson
      August 15, 2019 at 1:02 am


      Don –
      First, I just have to tell you how immeasurably impressed I am with your astounding ability to keep up with and answer everyone’s comments, which includes your eloquence of articulation and sound replies. I’ve perused quite a few, and you are, without mistake, comprehensively accurate at every juncture I’ve read.
      I am writing to you now because of an article posted on my FB page, by Geoff Grider of “Now The End Begins”, whom I have “known” for 6 years and have lightly corresponded with and previously followed; he has been instrumental in my forward learning before, as well as insights I have deeply appreciated, but have resolved to leave him with his errancies and just not comment. But his teaching in today’s article disturbs me, titled “??? ??? ???? ????? ??? ????????? ?????? ??? ?? ???? ??? ????? ??? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ????”. I wanted to say something but the content of his teaching was so doctrinally convoluted (Rightly Dividing though he does profess himself), I realized only a master of rightly dividing could profoundly and effectually contend, and I thought of you. It disturbs me because in essence, and subversively, he unwittingly teaches that the Body of Christ is the pinnacle of both programs…”one in the same” as he put it, as well as “born again” applying to us. One million people are subscribed to his website, and I just couldn’t leave this one alone. Also, I think Geoff is very confident in all that he teaches and believes, and would not accept a critical challenge by someone like me, and I’d really love for someone like you to try and help Geoff out – for his sake and those who follow him. I’m trusting he can be “reached” and is humbly able to rethink his views. And if “wishes were horses” you’d comment via my page (BarbaraOlsonWilson) so I can read your reply and “thumbs up”! His page is: https://www.facebook.com/geoffrey.grider – the article is from today, 08/14/19.
      Thank you, Don!
      Below is Geoff’s website posting:
      https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/new-testament-church-can-be-bride-body-jesus-christ-jerusalem/?fbclid=IwAR0Kvk1PKZy9vzFeso72-sDXjLmjtq8LGmRZK1UxTuZbd49UT6OF91KqtE4
      Reply ↓

      Delete

    2. doctrine Post author
      August 15, 2019 at 9:11 am

      Barbara,
      Thank you for your kind words. I am glad you have found my replies and comments helpful. The main problem with what Mr. Grider wrote is that he mixes what God revealed to Israel with what He revealed to the Church. Paul taught that the Church is the body of Christ. This language is unique to the Church. Israel was never spoken of as being such a body, of having that kind of relationship with God. The Old Testament revealed that Israel was the wife of God. When we find language about their idolatry it is expressed as adultery. Israel, is viewed as an unfaithful wife, and will be brought back into a right relationship with God, as a bride, as a faithful wife. The Church is not spoken of in these terms. To make his case, Mr. Grider quoted Revelation, John, 1 Peter, Isaiah, and Daniel. All these books were addressed to Jews, not to the Church. The Church is not present in Revelation. It has been removed via the Rapture. Revelation reveals God’s judgment of Israel and the nations (Gentiles). The Church does not undergo such judgment (Romans 5.9; 1 Thessalonians 1.10, 5.9). Peter wrote to believing Jews (1 Peter 1.1), not to the Church. So too John, James (James 1.1), and Jude. Mr. Grider has reached his conclusion because he does not understand that all Church doctrine comes from Paul. If you mix what Isaiah, Daniel, John, and Peter wrote with Paul, it will result in confusion.
      Reply ↓
      Barbara Wilson
      August 16, 2019 at 11:35 pm

      Don – Thank you! How come Geoff Grider doesn’t seem to “get it”, but tout’s himself as one who accurately divides? Les coined it perfectly, “Blenderizes.”
      May I copy-and-paste your reply to me on Geoff’s FB page, and simply say that I had submitted his article to you and am presenting your reply? Geoff might “hate my guts” for doing that, and I hope he doesn’t reply back to me with more “proof” to support his eisegetical reasoning because I, quite frankly, am not competent enough to debate, should that ensue. I would not want to embarrass him, but I do hope his viewers are exhorted to re-consider what he purports. For what it’s worth, and just a side-note, Geoff idolizes Peter Ruckman – perhaps Geoff teaches accordingly…I don’t know.
      You may wonder why this all matters to me; well, I’d like to believe that Geoff is still teachable and can re-align, whereby, his avid followers would benefit. I care about Geoff and he is doing the best he knows how, with as much as he believes he knows and understands – I believe he sincerely wants others to be as excited about the Bible as he is, and I would just love it if everyone concerned got it right.
      One last thing – do you know what has happened to Lonnie Martin? He has not posted on YT for quite a while and his teaching is very much missed!
      Reply ↓
      doctrine Post author
      August 17, 2019 at 9:17 am

      Barbara,
      You’re welcome. Yes, you can use what I wrote in response. I am not familiar with Peter Ruckman or Lonnie Martin so I am no help there. Two areas where I disagree with “right dividers” are their KJV only view and that Paul did not write Hebrews. They are off base in these areas.

      Delete
  11. False teacher and proclaimer of the wrong Gospel (John 3:16) in this dispensation of Grace has a brand new false doctrine which he is very excited about: Get Your 2023 NTEB Wall Calendar That’s Gorgeously Illustrated And Comes With Our Exclusive ‘Blue Line’ Pretribulation Rapture Spring Timeline

    The rapture has nothing to do with Israel at all because the Body of Christ is a separate entity, created by JESUS through Paul.
    Only after the rapture, God-the Lord JESUS will again deal with Israel and the Kingdom Gospel will come into force again.

    I can add this nonsense from Geoffrey Grider to the growing list of false teachings he is spreading.

    I myself asked to be banned from his site after he banned a genuine Gospel of Grace brother from his site and I'm glad I'm no longer a guest at his insane asylum.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Latest Comments

Luke 21 is for after the rapture How to Get Saved   You're now looking at a picture of the ONLY NORMAL person in existence   ...